Ecclesiastes / Chapter 2

Ecclesiastes 2

26 verses • Westminster Leningrad Codex

Translator's Introduction

What This Chapter Is About

Qohelet conducts a series of experiments in pleasure, achievement, and wealth to determine whether any of them yield lasting gain. He builds houses, plants vineyards, acquires servants, accumulates silver and gold, and denies himself nothing his eyes desire. The verdict: all of it is vapor and chasing after wind. He then compares wisdom to folly and concedes that wisdom has an advantage — the wise person sees where he is going — but both the wise and the fool meet the same end in death. The chapter climaxes with Qohelet hating life and hating his toil, since he must leave everything to a successor who may be a fool. The chapter closes with the first of several 'enjoyment passages': there is nothing better than to eat, drink, and find satisfaction in one's work, for even this comes from God's hand.

What Makes This Chapter Remarkable

This chapter is the most sustained first-person experiment in the Hebrew Bible. Qohelet does not argue from theory but from lived experience: 'I built, I planted, I acquired, I gathered.' He is not a detached philosopher but a participant-observer who has tested every avenue the ancient world considered a path to the good life. The shocking element is not his verdict — that pleasure and achievement are vapor — but his honesty about the process. He admits the pleasure was real (v. 10), the wisdom was genuine (v. 13), and the achievement was impressive (vv. 4-8). None of it was fake. It was simply temporary. The hatred of life in verse 17 is not depression but the rational conclusion of a man who has exhausted every human option for permanent satisfaction.

Translation Friction

The enjoyment passage in verses 24-26 creates an apparent contradiction: if everything is vapor, why commend eating and drinking? This tension is fundamental to Ecclesiastes and cannot be resolved by choosing one pole over the other. Qohelet simultaneously maintains that nothing lasts and that present enjoyment is a genuine gift from God. The resolution, if there is one, lies in the distinction between permanent gain (yitron) and present gift (mattanah). There is no lasting profit, but there are real moments of God-given pleasure. Learning to receive them without clutching them is, perhaps, the book's central spiritual discipline.

Connections

The catalog of achievements in verses 4-8 parallels the description of Solomon's wealth in 1 Kings 4-10. The enjoyment commendation echoes the Egyptian harper's songs and Siduri's advice to Gilgamesh: 'Let your belly be full, enjoy yourself always by day and by night.' But Qohelet anchors his enjoyment in God's hand (v. 24), which distinguishes his counsel from purely secular carpe diem. The phrase 'under the sun' continues to frame the investigation.

Ecclesiastes 2:1

אָמַ֤רְתִּֽי אֲנִי֙ בְּלִבִּ֔י לְכָה־נָּ֛א אֲנַסְּכָ֥ה בְשִׂמְחָ֖ה וּרְאֵ֣ה בְט֑וֹב וְהִנֵּ֥ה גַם־ה֖וּא הָֽבֶל׃

I said to myself, 'Come now, I will test you with pleasure — enjoy what is good.' But look, this too was vapor.

KJV I said in mine heart, Go to now, I will prove thee with mirth, therefore enjoy pleasure: and, behold, this also is vanity.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. Qohelet announces a new experiment: testing pleasure (simchah) as a candidate for lasting meaning. The address to himself in second person ('I will test you') creates a clinical distance — he is both experimenter and subject. The verdict ('this too was vapor') comes before the evidence, signaling that the outcome was already clear.
Ecclesiastes 2:2

לִשְׂח֖וֹק אָמַ֣רְתִּי מְהוֹלָ֑ל וּלְשִׂמְחָ֖ה מַה־זֹּ֥ה עֹשָֽׂה׃

Of laughter I said, 'It is senseless,' and of pleasure, 'What does it accomplish?'

KJV I said of laughter, It is mad: and of mirth, What doeth it?

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The word meholal ('mad, senseless') from halal ('to be boisterous, to rave') echoes the holelot ('madness') of 1:17. Laughter and pleasure are not condemned as sinful but as unproductive — they accomplish nothing lasting.
Ecclesiastes 2:3

תַּ֣רְתִּי בְלִבִּ֗י לִמְשׁ֤וֹךְ בַּיַּ֙יִן֙ אֶת־בְּשָׂרִ֔י וְלִבִּ֖י נֹהֵ֣ג בַּחׇכְמָ֑ה וְלֶאֱחֹ֣ז בְּסִכְל֗וּת עַ֤ד אֲשֶׁר־אֶרְאֶה֙ אֵי־זֶ֨ה ט֜וֹב לִבְנֵ֤י הָאָדָם֙ אֲשֶׁ֤ר יַעֲשׂוּ֙ תַּ֣חַת הַשָּׁמַ֔יִם מִסְפַּ֖ר יְמֵ֥י חַיֵּיהֶֽם׃

I explored with my mind how to stimulate my body with wine — my mind still guiding me with wisdom — and how to embrace folly, until I could see what is good for human beings to do under heaven during the few days of their lives.

KJV I searched in mine heart how to give myself unto wine, yet acquainting mine heart with wisdom; and to lay hold on folly, till I might see what was that good for the sons of men, which they should do under the heaven all the days of their life.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The verb tarti ('I explored, I investigated') suggests deliberate, methodical testing. Qohelet's genius as an experimenter shows here: he indulges in wine while maintaining intellectual control ('my mind still guiding with wisdom'). This is not reckless hedonism but controlled experimentation. The phrase mispar yeme chayyehem ('the number of the days of their lives') underscores how brief the testing window is.
Ecclesiastes 2:4

הִגְדַּ֖לְתִּי מַעֲשָׂ֑י בָּנִ֤יתִי לִי֙ בָּתִּ֔ים נָטַ֥עְתִּי לִ֖י כְּרָמִֽים׃

I undertook great projects. I built houses for myself. I planted vineyards for myself.

KJV I made me great works; I builded me houses; I planted me vineyards:

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The catalog of achievements begins. Each item echoes Solomon's building program (1 Kings 5-7). The repetition of 'for myself' (li) in the Hebrew emphasizes the self-directed nature of the enterprise.
Ecclesiastes 2:5

עָשִׂ֣יתִי לִ֔י גַּנּ֖וֹת וּפַרְדֵּסִ֑ים וְנָטַ֥עְתִּי בָהֶ֖ם עֵ֥ץ כׇּל־פֶּֽרִי׃

I made gardens and parks for myself and planted in them every kind of fruit tree.

KJV I made me gardens and orchards, and I planted trees in them of all kind of fruits:

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The word pardesim ('parks, orchards') is a Persian loanword (from pairidaeza, the source of English 'paradise'). Its presence is one of the linguistic markers of the book's late date, long after Solomon's era.
Ecclesiastes 2:6

עָשִׂ֣יתִי לִ֔י בְּרֵכ֖וֹת מָ֑יִם לְהַשְׁק֣וֹת מֵהֶ֔ם יַ֖עַר צוֹמֵ֥חַ עֵצִֽים׃

I made pools of water for myself to irrigate a forest of growing trees.

KJV I made me pools of water, to water therewith the wood that bringeth forth trees:

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The pools recall Solomon's pools south of Bethlehem. The image of human engineering conquering aridity connects back to the streams-and-sea imagery of 1:7 — but here, unlike nature's futile cycles, the water is directed to a purpose. Qohelet's engineering actually works. The question is whether it matters.
Ecclesiastes 2:7

קָנִ֙יתִי֙ עֲבָדִ֣ים וּשְׁפָח֔וֹת וּבְנֵי־בַ֖יִת הָ֣יָה לִ֑י גַּ֣ם מִקְנֶה֩ בָקָ֨ר וָצֹ֤אן הַרְבֵּה֙ הָ֣יָה לִ֔י מִכֹּ֛ל שֶׁהָי֥וּ לְפָנַ֖י בִּירוּשָׁלָֽ͏ִם׃

I acquired male and female servants and had servants born in my household. I also owned more herds and flocks than anyone who came before me in Jerusalem.

KJV I got me servants and maidens, and had servants born in my house; also I had great possessions of great and small cattle above all that were in Jerusalem before me:

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The bene bayit ('sons of the house') were slaves born within the household, considered more loyal than purchased slaves. The competitive comparison — 'more than anyone before me in Jerusalem' — sustains the Solomonic persona and underscores the scale of the experiment.
Ecclesiastes 2:8

כָּנַ֤סְתִּי לִי֙ גַּם־כֶּ֣סֶף וְזָהָ֔ב וּסְגֻלַּ֥ת מְלָכִ֖ים וְהַמְּדִינ֑וֹת עָשִׂ֨יתִי לִ֜י שָׁרִ֣ים וְשָׁר֗וֹת וְתַעֲנֻגֹ֛ת בְּנֵ֥י הָאָדָ֖ם שִׁדָּ֥ה וְשִׁדּֽוֹת׃

I also amassed silver and gold — the treasuries of kings and provinces. I provided myself with male and female singers and the delights of human beings — concubines in great number.

KJV I gathered me also silver and gold, and the peculiar treasure of kings and of the provinces: I gat me men singers and women singers, and the delights of the sons of men, as musical instruments, and that of all sorts.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The phrase shiddah ve-shiddot is one of the most disputed words in Ecclesiastes. The precise meaning is uncertain — suggestions include 'chests,' 'concubines,' 'cup-bearers,' or 'luxuries.' The context of human delights and the superlative form (shiddah ve-shiddot, like hevel havalim) suggests sexual pleasure, and we follow the traditional interpretation of 'concubines' as the final item in a progression from material to sensory to intimate pleasure.
  2. The word segullat ('treasuries, special possessions') is used elsewhere of Israel as God's 'treasured possession' (Exodus 19:5). Here it refers to royal wealth — an ironic reversal.
Ecclesiastes 2:9

וְגָדַ֣לְתִּי וְהוֹסַ֔פְתִּי מִכֹּ֛ל שֶׁהָיָ֥ה לְפָנַ֖י בִּירוּשָׁלָ֑͏ִם אַ֥ף חׇכְמָתִ֖י עָ֥מְדָה לִּֽי׃

I became greater and wealthier than anyone before me in Jerusalem, and through it all my wisdom stayed with me.

KJV So I was great, and increased more than all that were before me in Jerusalem: also my wisdom remained with me.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The crucial note: af chokhmati amdah li ('my wisdom stayed with me'). Qohelet did not lose his judgment in the process. The experiment was conducted under controlled conditions. Whatever verdict he reaches about pleasure and achievement cannot be dismissed as the regret of someone who lost himself in excess.
Ecclesiastes 2:10

וְכֹל֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר שָׁאֲל֣וּ עֵינַ֔י לֹ֥א אָצַ֖לְתִּי מֵהֶ֑ם לֹא־מָנַ֨עְתִּי אֶת־לִבִּ֜י מִכׇּל־שִׂמְחָ֗ה כִּֽי־לִבִּ֤י שָׂמֵ֙חַ֙ מִכׇּל־עֲמָלִ֔י וְזֶה־הָיָ֥ה חֶלְקִ֖י מִכׇּל־עֲמָלִֽי׃

Whatever my eyes desired I did not withhold from them. I refused my heart no pleasure, for my heart found joy in all my toil — and this was my reward from all my toil.

KJV And whatsoever mine eyes desired I kept not from them, I withheld not my heart from any joy; for my heart rejoiced in all my labour: and this was my portion of all my labour.

Notes & Key Terms 1 term

Key Terms

חֵלֶק cheleq
"reward" — portion, share, allotment, lot, inheritance

Cheleq is Qohelet's word for what life actually yields — not lasting profit (yitron) but a present portion. The distinction is critical: cheleq is real but temporary, the share you get while you are alive. It cannot be stored, accumulated beyond death, or passed on intact.

Translator Notes

  1. This verse is the honest center of the chapter. The pleasure was real. The joy was genuine. Qohelet does not deny that his achievements brought him satisfaction. The word cheleq ('portion, share, reward') is important — it is the dividend the effort actually paid. But as the next verse will clarify, this portion is all there is. There is no yitron ('lasting surplus') beyond it.
Ecclesiastes 2:11

וּפָנִ֣יתִי אֲנִ֗י בְּכׇל־מַעֲשַׂי֙ שֶׁעָשׂ֣וּ יָדַ֔י וּבֶעָמָ֖ל שֶׁעָמַ֣לְתִּי לַעֲשׂ֑וֹת וְהִנֵּ֨ה הַכֹּ֥ל הֶ֙בֶל֙ וּרְע֣וּת ר֔וּחַ וְאֵ֥ין יִתְר֖וֹן תַּ֥חַת הַשָּֽׁמֶשׁ׃

Then I surveyed everything my hands had done and the toil I had labored to accomplish, and look — everything was vapor and chasing after wind. There was no lasting gain under the sun.

KJV Then I looked on all the works that my hands had wrought, and on the labour that I had laboured to do: and, behold, all was vanity and vexation of spirit, and there was no profit under the sun.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The verdict on the pleasure experiment is identical to the verdict on the wisdom experiment (1:14): hevel u-re'ut ruach ('vapor and chasing after wind'). The added phrase ein yitron tachat ha-shemesh ('there is no lasting gain under the sun') makes explicit what was implied. The pleasure was real (v. 10) but not lasting. The experience yielded a portion but not a surplus.
Ecclesiastes 2:12

וּפָנִ֣יתִי אֲנִ֗י לִרְאוֹת֙ חׇכְמָ֔ה וְהוֹלֵל֖וֹת וְסִכְל֑וּת כִּ֣י ׀ מָ֣ה הָאָדָ֗ם שֶׁיָּבוֹא֙ אַחֲרֵ֣י הַמֶּ֔לֶךְ אֵ֥ת אֲשֶׁר־כְּבָ֖ר עָשֽׂוּהוּ׃

Then I turned to consider wisdom alongside madness and folly. For what can the one who comes after the king do? Only what has already been done.

KJV And I turned myself to behold wisdom, and madness, and folly: for what can the man do that cometh after the king? even that which hath been already done.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The rhetorical question acknowledges the unique advantage of the Solomonic persona: no one will be able to conduct this experiment on a grander scale. If the king with unlimited resources found no lasting gain, no successor can expect to find it either.
Ecclesiastes 2:13

וְרָאִ֣יתִי אָ֔נִי שֶׁיֵּ֥שׁ יִתְר֛וֹן לַחׇכְמָ֖ה מִן־הַסִּכְל֑וּת כִּֽיתְר֥וֹן הָא֖וֹר מִן־הַחֹֽשֶׁךְ׃

And I saw that wisdom has an advantage over folly, just as light has an advantage over darkness.

KJV Then I saw that wisdom excelleth folly, as far as light excelleth darkness.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. Qohelet is not anti-wisdom. He freely concedes its superiority over folly — the comparison to light versus darkness is the strongest possible endorsement. The question is not whether wisdom is better but whether it is enough.
Ecclesiastes 2:14

הֶחָכָ֞ם עֵינָ֣יו בְּרֹאשׁ֗וֹ וְהַכְּסִיל֙ בַּחֹ֣שֶׁךְ הוֹלֵ֔ךְ וְיָדַ֣עְתִּי גַם־אָ֔נִי שֶׁמִּקְרֶ֥ה אֶחָ֖ד יִקְרֶ֥ה אֶת־כֻּלָּֽם׃

The wise person's eyes are in his head, but the fool walks in darkness. Yet I also know that one fate overtakes them both.

KJV The wise man's eyes are in his head; but the fool walketh in darkness: and I myself perceived also that one event happeneth to them all.

Notes & Key Terms 1 term

Key Terms

מִקְרֶה miqreh
"fate" — occurrence, happening, chance, fate; what befalls a person

From qarah ('to encounter, to befall'). Qohelet uses miqreh to describe the unavoidable events — especially death — that happen to all people regardless of wisdom, virtue, or achievement. It is not 'destiny' in the theological sense but 'what happens' in the empirical sense.

Translator Notes

  1. The phrase 'eyes in his head' is a compact metaphor for foresight and awareness. The miqreh echad ('one fate') that overtakes both is death — Qohelet does not say the word yet but the following verses make it explicit.
Ecclesiastes 2:15

וְאָמַ֨רְתִּי אֲנִ֜י בְּלִבִּ֗י כְּמִקְרֵ֤ה הַכְּסִיל֙ גַּם־אֲנִ֣י יִקְרֵ֔נִי וְלָ֧מָּה חָכַ֛מְתִּי אֲנִ֖י אָ֣ז יוֹתֵ֑ר וְדִבַּ֣רְתִּי בְלִבִּ֔י שֶׁגַּם־זֶ֖ה הָֽבֶל׃

Then I said to myself, 'What happens to the fool will happen to me as well. So why have I been so excessively wise?' And I said to myself that this too is vapor.

KJV Then said I in my heart, As it happeneth to the fool, so it happeneth even to me; and why was I then more wise? Then I said in my heart, that this also is vanity.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The question 'why have I been wise?' is not a rejection of wisdom but an anguished recognition of its limits. If both wise and foolish end in death, what advantage does all that extra wisdom provide? The answer — which Qohelet will spend the rest of the book working out — is: a real but temporary one.
Ecclesiastes 2:16

כִּ֣י אֵ֥ין זִכְר֛וֹן לֶחָכָ֖ם עִֽם־הַכְּסִ֣יל לְעוֹלָ֑ם בְּשֶׁכְּבָ֞ר הַיָּמִ֤ים הַבָּאִים֙ הַכֹּ֣ל נִשְׁכָּ֔ח וְאֵ֛יךְ יָמ֥וּת הֶחָכָ֖ם עִֽם־הַכְּסִֽיל׃

For the wise person, like the fool, will not be remembered forever — in the days to come everything will already be forgotten. How can it be that the wise person dies just like the fool?

KJV For there is no remembrance of the wise more than of the fool for ever; seeing that which now is in the days to come shall all be forgotten. And how dieth the wise man? as the fool.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The complaint echoes 1:11 — memory fails, and the wise are forgotten along with the foolish. The exclamation ve-eikh yamut he-chakham im ha-kesil ('how can it be that the wise dies alongside the fool!') expresses genuine outrage. This is not resignation but protest.
Ecclesiastes 2:17

וְשָׂנֵ֙אתִי֙ אֶת־הַ֣חַיִּ֔ים כִּ֣י רַ֤ע עָלַי֙ הַֽמַּעֲשֶׂ֔ה שֶׁנַּעֲשָׂ֖ה תַּ֣חַת הַשָּׁ֑מֶשׁ כִּֽי־הַכֹּ֥ל הֶ֖בֶל וּרְע֥וּת רֽוּחַ׃

So I hated life, because what is done under the sun was grievous to me, for everything is vapor and chasing after wind.

KJV Therefore I hated life; because the work that is wrought under the sun is grievous unto me: for all is vanity and vexation of spirit.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The Hebrew is blunt: ve-sane'ti et ha-chayyim ('I hated life'). The verb sane ('to hate') is unqualified. This is the most extreme emotional statement in the chapter and one of the most striking in all of wisdom literature. Qohelet does not say he was disappointed or disillusioned — he says he hated life. The cause is not personal suffering but the structural injustice of death erasing all distinctions.
Ecclesiastes 2:18

וְשָׂנֵ֤אתִי אֲנִי֙ אֶת־כׇּל־עֲמָלִ֔י שֶׁאֲנִ֥י עָמֵ֖ל תַּ֣חַת הַשָּׁ֑מֶשׁ שֶׁ֣אַנִּיחֶ֔נּוּ לָאָדָ֖ם שֶׁיִּהְיֶ֥ה אַחֲרָֽי׃

I hated all the results of my toil at which I had worked under the sun, because I must leave them to the one who comes after me.

KJV Yea, I hated all my labour which I had taken under the sun: because I should leave it unto the man that shall be after me.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The hatred extends from life itself (v. 17) to the products of labor. The reason is not that the work was bad but that its fruits must be transferred to an unknown successor. Inheritance forces Qohelet to confront the fact that ownership is temporary — the builder never gets to keep what he built.
Ecclesiastes 2:19

וּמִ֣י יוֹדֵ֗עַ הֶחָכָ֤ם יִהְיֶה֙ א֣וֹ סָכָ֔ל וְיִשְׁלַט֙ בְּכׇל־עֲמָלִ֔י שֶׁעָמַ֥לְתִּי וְשֶׁחָכַ֖מְתִּי תַּ֣חַת הַשָּׁ֑מֶשׁ גַּם־זֶ֖ה הָֽבֶל׃

And who knows whether that person will be wise or foolish? Yet he will have control over everything I toiled at and applied my wisdom to under the sun. This too is vapor.

KJV And who knoweth whether he shall be a wise man or a fool? yet shall he have rule over all my labour wherein I have laboured, and wherein I have shewed myself wise under the sun. This is also vanity.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The uncertainty about the heir's character adds insult to the injury of losing one's work. Qohelet's wisdom cannot even guarantee that the successor will be competent. The verb yishlat ('will have control, will rule over') emphasizes that the heir gains authority over what he did not earn.
Ecclesiastes 2:20

וְסַבּ֥וֹתִי אֲנִ֖י לְיַאֵ֣שׁ אֶת־לִבִּ֑י עַ֚ל כׇּל־הֶ֣עָמָ֔ל שֶׁעָמַ֖לְתִּי תַּ֥חַת הַשָּֽׁמֶשׁ׃

So I turned to let my heart despair over all the toil at which I had worked under the sun.

KJV Therefore I went about to cause my heart to despair of all the labour which I took under the sun.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The verb ya'esh ('to despair, to give up hope') marks the emotional low point. Qohelet deliberately allows himself to feel the full weight of the realization. This is intellectual honesty carried to its painful conclusion.
Ecclesiastes 2:21

כִּי־יֵ֣שׁ אָדָ֗ם שֶׁעֲמָל֛וֹ בְּחׇכְמָ֥ה וּבְדַ֖עַת וּבְכִשְׁר֑וֹן וּלְאָדָ֞ם שֶׁלֹּ֤א עָֽמַל־בּוֹ֙ יִתְּנֶ֣נּוּ חֶלְק֔וֹ גַּם־זֶ֥ה הֶ֖בֶל וְרָעָ֥ה רַבָּֽה׃

For here is a person whose toil was done with wisdom, knowledge, and skill — yet he must hand over his portion to someone who did not work for it. This too is vapor, and a terrible wrong.

KJV For there is a man whose labour is in wisdom, and in knowledge, and in equity; yet to a man that hath not laboured therein shall he leave it for his portion. This also is vanity and a great evil.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The word kishron ('skill, success, competence') appears only in Ecclesiastes. The injustice is stated plainly: skill and effort produce results that are then given to someone with no investment. The phrase ra'ah rabbah ('a terrible wrong, a great evil') is stronger than the usual hevel verdict — this is not just transient, it is unjust.
Ecclesiastes 2:22

כִּ֠י מֶה־הֹוֶ֤ה לָֽאָדָם֙ בְּכׇל־עֲמָל֔וֹ וּבְרַעְי֖וֹן לִבּ֑וֹ שֶׁה֥וּא עָמֵ֖ל תַּ֥חַת הַשָּֽׁמֶשׁ׃

For what does a person gain from all his toil and the striving of his heart at which he toils under the sun?

KJV For what hath man of all his labour, and of the vexation of his heart, wherein he hath laboured under the sun?

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The question reprises 1:3 but adds ra'yon libbo ('the striving of his heart') — not just physical labor but the mental and emotional investment. The rhetorical question expects the answer: nothing lasting.
Ecclesiastes 2:23

כִּ֧י כׇל־יָמָ֣יו מַכְאֹבִ֗ים וָכַ֙עַס֙ עִנְיָנ֔וֹ גַּם־בַּלַּ֖יְלָה לֹא־שָׁכַ֣ב לִבּ֑וֹ גַּם־זֶ֖ה הֶ֥בֶל הֽוּא׃

For all his days are filled with pain, and his occupation is vexation. Even at night his mind does not rest. This too is vapor.

KJV For all his days are sorrows, and his travail grief; yea, his heart taketh not rest in the night. This is also vanity.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The portrait of sleepless anxiety completes the picture. Toil does not end at sunset — the mind continues to churn through the night. The word makh'ovim ('pains, sorrows') and ka'as ('vexation, anger') characterize the inner life of the achiever as one of chronic distress.
Ecclesiastes 2:24

אֵֽין־ט֤וֹב בָּאָדָם֙ שֶׁיֹּאכַ֣ל וְשָׁתָ֔ה וְהֶרְאָ֧ה אֶת־נַפְשׁ֛וֹ ט֖וֹב בַּעֲמָל֑וֹ גַּם־זֹה֙ רָאִ֣יתִי אָ֔נִי כִּ֛י מִיַּ֥ד הָאֱלֹהִ֖ים הִֽיא׃

There is nothing better for a person than to eat and drink and find satisfaction in his toil. This too, I saw, is from the hand of God.

KJV There is nothing better for a man, than that he should eat and drink, and that he should make his soul enjoy good in his labour. This also I saw, that it was from the hand of God.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The shift from 'I hated life' (v. 17) to 'eat, drink, and find satisfaction' (v. 24) is jarring but intentional. Qohelet's counsel is not hedonism — it is received enjoyment. The hand of God as the source transforms this from secular advice into theological affirmation: even in a vapor-filled world, God gives moments of genuine goodness.
Ecclesiastes 2:25

כִּ֣י מִ֥י יֹאכַ֛ל וּמִ֥י יָח֖וּשׁ ח֥וּץ מִמֶּֽנִּי׃

For who can eat or who can experience anything apart from him?

KJV For who can eat, or who else can hasten hereunto, more than I?

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The Hebrew text is ambiguous — 'apart from him' (mimmenni) could refer to God or to Qohelet. Some manuscripts read 'apart from me,' reinforcing the Solomonic persona (who had more opportunity to eat and enjoy than Solomon?). We follow the reading that refers to God, consistent with the theological framing of verse 24: all enjoyment ultimately comes from God.
Ecclesiastes 2:26

כִּ֣י לְאָדָ֞ם שֶׁטּ֣וֹב לְפָנָ֗יו נָתַן֙ חׇכְמָ֤ה וְדַ֙עַת֙ וְשִׂמְחָ֔ה וְלַחוֹטֶא֙ נָתַ֣ן עִנְיָ֔ן לֶאֱסֹ֖ף וְלִכְנ֑וֹס לָתֵת֙ לְט֣וֹב לִפְנֵ֣י הָאֱלֹהִ֔ים גַּם־זֶ֥ה הֶ֖בֶל וּרְע֥וּת רֽוּחַ׃

For to the person who is good in his sight, God gives wisdom, knowledge, and joy; but to the one who misses the mark, he gives the task of gathering and collecting, only to hand it over to the one who is good before God. This too is vapor and chasing after wind.

KJV For God giveth to a man that is good in his sight wisdom, and knowledge, and joy: but to the sinner he giveth travail, to gather and to heap up, that he may give to him that is good before God. This also is vanity and vexation of spirit.

Notes & Key Terms

Translator Notes

  1. The word choteh ('sinner, one who misses the mark') is rendered here without the heavy theological freight that 'sinner' carries in English. The Hebrew root chata means 'to miss' (as an archer misses a target). The person who misses the mark accumulates wealth that ultimately passes to the person who is tov lifne ha-Elohim ('good before God'). But even this seemingly just distribution is declared vapor — Qohelet refuses to let any system, even a moral one, claim permanence.
Chapter 1 Report an error Ecclesiastes index Chapter 3